



(No Ratings Yet)Believe me, I know…you’re sick and tired of yet another “seat at the table” discussion focused on HR’s need to be more strategic in their organization. I predicted that 2008 would end with HR still not gaining that elusive chair, but for the sake of argument, let’s assume they did. Yes readers, the Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) has finally arrived and is ready to roll up her sleeves and provide highly strategic value. What happens next?
Enjoying the coveted view, she looks around and likely sees the CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, CMO and perhaps other executives discussing the current and future state of the business. Given the significant influence that each executive exerts, what happens when the individual personalities change? Put another way, how does C-level tenure impact one’s ability to drive value?
Right. So your COO and CMO will survive less than three years. Your CIO is about four and a half and your CFO and CEO less than five and a half. Suddenly it hits you - one of your most important tasks now that you have a seat at the table is to focus on a succession plan for those in the C-suite.
This is an uncomfortable realization, yet an item that is often overlooked, even by market-leading organizations. What’s perhaps more uncomfortable is the assessment of your own C-level survival, with Workforce Magazine’s analysis (and Corsello’s math) putting an average CHRO in seat for approximately 3.1 years.
If all this executive rotation has your head spinning, grab some ginger pills, put on the motion sickness patch, stay calm, and let’s try and keep the conversation going.
Posted in Featured, Strategic HR |




(4.2 out of 5)



(4.2 out of 5)(C) 2008 Ulrich Kerler & Marcus Schiesser Report an issue | Feedback | Privacy Policy | TOS
Posted on 22. July 2008 at 17:47
On the topic of having a seat at the C-suite table…
Here is a link to a story written by my colleague.
http://www.hrexecutive.com/HRE/story.jsp?storyId=69320200
http://www.cpp.com/PRESS/HRE_Online_HR_Personality.pdf
There is an interesting trend in the MBTI personality preferences of HR directors (mostly Feeling) versus other people in the C-suiten (mostly Thinking). Perhaps the prevalence of Feeling types in the HR role creates an “odd man out” mentality. This makes me think of the Sesame Street song: One of these things is not like the other…
Posted on 23. July 2008 at 06:11
Great links Breanne. I must have missed that story when first published in February. I believe this does have a significant impact on both perception and reality of HR’s value to the C-suite conversation. Thanks for the comments.
Best,
Mark